Saturday, November 12, 2016

Why Thanksgiving?

Why do we celebrate Thanksgiving?  It is a holiday observed all over the United States.  It is a day in which we celebrate gratitude in general.  We celebrate gratitude to God for all of his blessings in our lives, and we take as our model, the example of the gratitude displayed by the Pilgrims of 1620 who arrived at this continent on the ship, “Mayflower”.

Who were those men, women, and children, and why did they leave their homes and cross the Atlantic Ocean to start new lives in the Americas?

The story begins with the Protestant reformers such as John Huss, Martin Luther, and John Calvin.  The reformation of the Roman Catholic Church began in Europe, Germany, Holland, and other countries during the later half of the 16th century.  The ideas of the reformers caught the attention of many and they spread rapidly to England.  In the first part of the 17th century certain Englishmen took it upon themselves to separate from the Royal Church, or the Church of England as founded by Henry the 8th.  During the reign of King James a preacher named John Browne had much success in persuading people to join with him in a new sect.  They called themselves “Brownists”.  His followers preached and published pamphlets against the Church of the Realm; the Church of England.  It is interesting to remember that this was the same time as the publication of the most famous edition of the Bible in English, the King James Version, first published in 1611.

In 1607 the Brownists, in reaction to persecution from the king, decided they had to leave their native land and seek asylum in Holland where there was more freedom of thought.  They escaped primarily to Amsterdam but after a few years they had to flee once again to escape the searches of the King.  This time they relocated in Leyden, not far from Amsterdam.  In Leyden they again printed pamphlets against the King of England and his church.  The spiritual leader of these Leyden families, and he who managed the printing operations, was a man named William Brewster.  This William Brewster is my 11th great grandfather and the ire of King James began to focus on him.  The king’s police went to Holland in search of William but he had again fled and was living in hiding from the king.  About this time the Leyden families decided they had to leave Europe all together if they were to live their religion in peace.  The youth of the Brownist families were reaching the age when they began to be strongly influenced by the liberal culture of the day, and this worried the parents.  They wanted to get away.  After much debate they chose to migrate to America where they hoped to find complete religious freedom.

A group of families called “Puritans” had already sailed to America in 1607 and had founded a place in the New World called Jamestown in honor of the king.  The Brownists did not want to join these Jamestown families because they had still different religious ideas.  They hoped to start their own colony separate from all others.  Today we call these Brownist families from Leyden the “Pilgrims”.

The voyage to the North American continent had been made many times before 1620.  Columbus, Francis Drake, Magellan, and other commercial groups had made the trip and there were plenty of sea captains available who knew how to navigate the Atlantic Ocean.  The Pilgrims did not have much money between them but they were able to convince investors that, in exchange for help with funding the great expedition, they would send back valuable products from the New World during their first years.

The Pilgrims purchased one ship and the services of another complete with crews and captains.  The first ship was named the “Speedwell” and the other, the “Mayflower”.  There were many problems with the Speedwell.  The travelers had to return three times to various ports in England to make repairs.  In the end they had to abandon the Speedwell along with a part of their original group while the remainder continued on with the one hired ship, the Mayflower.

On the 6th of September 1620 the Mayflower sailed from the port city of Plymouth, England, with 102 passengers and two dogs on board.  The passengers consisted of two groups; those who were seeking religious liberty, called the “Saints”, and those who were primarily seeking economic gain, called “Strangers”.  In all there were 41 Saints and 61 Strangers among the passengers.  From the start they did not get on well.  They had very different purposes and different religious backgrounds.  But the common goal of reaching the new world helped them work through disagreements along the way. 

Leaving so late in the year they knew they were going to arrive in the middle of winter.  (Reminds you of the experience of the Willie Handcart Company, and the outcomes were not too different.)  Upon their arrival they would have to quickly build shelters, find food and fresh water, and prepare for a long, cold winter.  They reached land on the 9th or 10th of November, 1620, dropping anchor in what is today called Cape Cod Bay off the coast of Massachusetts.  Close to where they landed they encountered a large rock in the water along the shore that actually hindered their landing party.  The Pilgrims called the place of their landing, Plymouth, and the rock became known as “Plymouth Rock”. 

Their first tasks were to find fresh water and food since all that they had brought with them on the Mayflower had been consumed.  They found a fresh stream and a wood where they could cut logs for construction and firewood for heat.  Food was more of a problem.  In the winter they did not find wild deer.  Searching everywhere they came across some curious sand mounds.  They began to dig into these.  To everyone’s surprise they found edible corn buried in the mounds.  The corn actually belonged to the natives of the area, American Indians.  The Indians had hidden the corn to save it for planting in the next spring.  But the Pilgrims were dying of hunger and in their dangerous circumstances they took the corn and ate it, giving thanks to God for his “gift” to them.  When the Indians discovered that someone had been stealing their corn, tensions immediately arose between the Pilgrims and the Indians. 

There were many survival problems for the Pilgrims during the months following their landing at Plymouth.  The Mayflower and her crew were not able to return to England until the 5th of April, 1621.  During this first winter half of the company perished from illnesses resulting from cold, scant food, and inadequate shelter.   It was difficult to cut wood and build houses with so much snow and cold temperatures.  At least 50 of the original 102 original passengers died that winter.  Elder William Brewster was one who survived and, together with one of the “Strangers”, Miles Standish, dug graves for many of the dead.

In the spring the survivors planted corn and other crops and found animals in the woods for food.  In October of 1621 the Pilgrims, to celebrate a good harvest and improved relations with the Indians declared a day of Thanksgiving.  They enjoyed a good feast of corn, deer meat, roast duck, clams and other sea foods, bread and other vegetables, with plums and berries for dessert, all washed down with many gallons of white and red wines made from wild grapes.

The Pilgrims invited the Indian chief, “Massasoit” and his people to participate in their feast.  He came with a contingent of 90 hungry braves.  Fortunately they brought with them a number of freshly killed deer. 
The party was considered a great success and was repeated for many years afterwards by the people of New England.  It did not become a national holiday until the great civil war.  President Abraham Lincoln declared it a day of giving thanks for the many blessings of God to this country.  Since that time the entire country has honored the day by recounting the stories of the Pilgrims and preparing a feast which generally includes turkey (although there is no mention of turkey in the record left by the Pilgrims) and other foods of the autumn harvest.

For many it is the favorite holiday of the year because it receives more reverence and less commercialism than most other holidays.  It has become an occasion for families to get together, share recipes, cook together, and generally be reunited.  We do not purchase gifts.  We get together as families, we eat together, play games together, work in our yards, watch football, and rest.

Consider the words of Amulek in the Book of Mormon:
“That ye contend no more against the Holy Ghost, but that ye receive it, and take upon you the name of Christ; that ye humble yourselves even to the dust, and worship God, in whatsoever place ye may be in, in spirit and in truth; and that ye live in thanksgiving daily, for the many mercies and blessings which he doth bestow upon you.” (Alma 34:38)

And the words of the Savior, Jesus Christ:
“But ye are commanded in all things to ask of God, who giveth liberally; and that which the Spirit testifies unto you even so I would that ye should do in all holiness of heart, walking uprightly before me, considering the end of your salvation, doing all things with prayer and thanksgiving, that ye may not be seduced by evil spirits, or doctrines of devils, or the commandments of men; for some are of men, and others of devils.” (D&C 46:7)


May we continue to celebrate Thanksgiving, that our children and grandchildren and their children after them, will remember our brave forefathers, and also God’s purposes in setting up this great country for the restoration of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. 

Sunday, November 6, 2016

How Many Cousins?

How Many Cousins?

Some of us are under the impression that all of our dead have had their ordinance work completed.  When I was preparing for a presentation in Argentina on family history and temple work I wanted to impress upon my listeners how many relatives we could have when we consider the descendants of all our direct ancestors.  By this I mean that for every direct-line ancestral family I can perform ordinances not only for that immediate family, but also for all of their descendants!  I sat down and prepared a little spreadsheet program to calculate how many people that might involve going back a given number of generations.  The results are eye opening.

Say you go back 10 generations.  Assuming an average of 25 years per generation that puts you at about the year 1766.  It is difficult to find records in the United States for persons living much earlier than that.  So going back 10 generations, if I count myself as the first generation, and assuming no intermarriage between cousins and no brothers of one family marrying sisters of another, I will have 512 direct ancestral families living in about the year 1766.  If I further assume that each of those 512 ancestral families had three children who lived to adulthood and married, and I think that is a conservative estimate, and assuming each of those three children married and had three children of their own, and assuming that reproductive rate continues uninterrupted down to the present day, the number of people to whom I have a specific ancestral relationship is 60.4 million.

Now I must be quick to point out that of that 60.4 million roughly 59 million would have been born within the last 110 years, which makes them ineligible for vicarious temple ordinances without the consent of the closest living relative, which in most of these cases will be hard to get.  So that leaves me with a mere 1.4 million persons whose vicarious temple work I am responsible for, and with every decade that goes by another half-million or so become eligible.  I think I can stay busy for the next couple of years searching for the identities of a million and a half distant cousins. 


Tuesday, November 1, 2016

The Trouble with "Religion"

The Trouble with "Religion"

What could possible be wrong with a word that for millennia has tried to represent peace, faith, piety, concern for fellow man, and in most cases, unselfish acts of kindness?  There is something about the word, “religion”, that mildly offends my spirit and bids me avoid its use in referring to my own personal value and life system.

Part of my hesitation is because the word refers to so many diverse traditions with such wide-ranging beliefs and practices.  When a word is used to define too many different things, it loses its power to clearly describe anything at all.

The word “religion” is often used in a subtly derogatory sense, perhaps as a tyrannical master restricting personal freedom in unreasonable ways, as in “such-and-such is against my religion,’ or “my religion won’t allow me to do that.”  This usage gives religion a negative connotation as something with which we might regret our association.  It might make others question why we would continue with such a personally controlling program.

Throughout history horrid atrocities have been committed in the name of religion.  Adherents and especially leaders of religions too easily change doctrines or interpret dogmas in ways that, in their eyes, justify persecution, oppression, and even violence towards those who are perceived as having a “different”, or ‘unacceptable” behavior or belief.  The treatment of the Hebrew people by their neighbors since the days of Moses is a sufficient case study.

In modern times the term “religion” carries a connotation of responding to or accepting something based primarily on emotion.   We can observe that the most effective advocate of religion is a speaker highly skilled in creating an emotional response in his or her audience.  (Here could be inserted another discussion on the difference between emotion and the effect of the Holy Ghost.  The externally observable results of the two influences can be easily confused.)  Emotion is often placed over against reason, and the use of emotion may be considered to give the proponent of religion an unfair advantage over his hearers, so that in their supposed intellectual weakness they are led unknowingly into accepting concepts that are at least demeaning if not ultimately damaging to them. 

So is there a good alternative to the word “religion” in referring to a personal system of values?  Here is one suggestion.  I like to think of myself as participating not in a religion, but in a “Plan”. 

It is a reasonable, rational plan that answers all of life’s “terrible questions” regarding who I really am, where I came from, and what is my purpose here.  It is a happy plan that bids me be cheerful and positive in my thoughts and words.  It is a plan that accepts all persons, regardless of their beliefs and behaviors, as worthy of my honest and hopeful consideration.   It is a plan laid down in distant ages past, before this world was, at a time and place that cannot be appreciated by any mortal calculation or imaginative theory.  It contemplates all of mankind, from first to last; from least to greatest, all cultures, all languages, all traditions, all worlds.  It is a totally inclusive plan.  There is no alternative to it.  We are all participants whether we know it or not.  The plan is concrete, it is “bricks and mortar”, it informs everything I do.   It has many names, but for me, “religion” is not one of them.  Knowledge is what I seek, not an emotional, philosophical “religion”.


Some will answer that this “plan” is nothing more than “religion” by another name.  But I disagree.  It has nothing to do with emotion, or hopes, or traditions.  It is evidenced in everything I see.  It is beyond belief. It comprehends all questions, all theories, all arguments.  It invites me to ask questions, to seek knowledge, to humbly realize that I am in the middle of something great and wonderful.  It is a joyful plan.